I'm ashamed we ever used unpaid interns

Guest blog post by Leanne Tritton, MD, ING Media. This blog post was originally produced for http://graduatefog.co.uk

 

Firstly, a little bit about ING MEDIA. I founded the agency in 1999 and we are now a team of 20. Like many other small business owners, I have at different times struggled with all of the various aspects of running a business. So I have a huge amount of sympathy for businesses which are trying to do their best by clients and staff.

I can’t remember exactly when we started to use interns but if memory serves me, it was after a combination of outside requests and also members of our team suggesting that we offer internships so that people can gain good job experience.

Internships are so prevalent that I just assumed this approach was fine and we were giving young people an opportunity.

In retrospect, this excuse is poor but I have to be honest and say that I didn’t give it a huge amount of thought. I can be clear that there was no intention to ‘exploit’ graduates – in fact, I was trying to help. And we always reimbursed expenses for travel within the M25 so I reasoned our interns weren’t out of pocket.

I only discovered that what we were doing wasn’t okay when I was chatting to our employment lawyer at Irenicon who told me that it was essentially illegal as it contravened the Minimum Wage Act. The fact that no-one prosecutes is a different matter entirely.

Interestingly, when I discussed this with younger members of the team, they were very concerned that we should think of stopping the internship programme as most employers now expect graduates to have some form of experience on their CV, before being considered for entry-level jobs.

Internships are often a way of demonstrating that you have skills relevant to the industry that you are trying to break into. There are many graduates who ‘want’ to work for free. Generally, they are supported by their parents.

However, over the last few years there have been very compelling campaigns run in both the architecture and broadcasting industries that left me feeling very uncomfortable with the position we had taken. We have always prided ourselves on being a fair and ethical (I didn’t say perfect – there is a difference) agency and I felt uncomfortable with now ‘knowingly’ doing the wrong thing.

So quite simply we decided to pay interns as it is the right thing to do. That was in June 2010. My ‘conversion’ to the cause was a little bit like using bottled water – you buy bottled water (everyone does) and then at no particular time just realise that it’s stupid and stop. There was no particular epiphany.

The benefits of having an intern far outweigh the cost. For those interested, the gross cost is about £958 per month. We take our programme very seriously and interns feel that they are truly valued. Tanya asked me if interns now work harder if they are paid – I can’t say I have noticed a difference but that is because they always worked hard to impress – we have just evened up our contribution.

I also reflected on my own career path – whilst my parents gave me unlimited love and encouragement, their corporate contacts were pitiful. As a country policeman, my dad’s connections stretched to the local greengrocer (I did get a few pieces of fruit from time to time) but little else. They certainly weren’t able to get me in the door with a glitzy media company and there was no way that I or they would have been able to cover the costs of me working for free.

Now, I am firmly of the view that unpaid internships are morally and legally wrong. I don’t believe that small companies set out to exploit graduates but by not paying them, that is exactly what they do. The very basic principle that ‘everyone should be paid for their labour’ is the right one and as business owners we need to respect this. All businesses have costs – and paying your junior staff a fair wage for their work is one of them.

The subject of large companies having unpaid internships is completely cut and dried – they have no excuse. They must know what the law is. They have well trained and informed legal and Human Resource departments – how can they not know. They also have the resources to pay – so there is no excuse.

If a business like ours can pay interns, there is no reason why other businesses can’t.

Comments (0)
Think before you print! Save energy and paper! Do you really need to print this page?
Fee Income
X
Drag here
  • This field should only be completed by the individual with responsibility for your company's PRCA membership.
  • NB - Once you check the box to the left of this field and click update this figure is fixed for the entire year.
  • Fee income is defined as fees or income arising from time spent on carrying out public relations consultancy work plus any mark up and any handling charges or profits made on disbursement or expenses.
  • This figure
    1. will be used to calculate your membership subscription fee for 2009
    2. will be published on the PRCA website and in the yearbook.
  • This figure must include the fees from any subsidiary companies but not associated companies (see below).
  • If you are bound by Sarbanes-Oxley please select that accordingly, we will contact you individually about your fee income.
Holders of public office
X
Drag here
  • Please list any employees who hold any public office including members of House of Parliament, members of local authorities or of any statutory organisations or bodies who are full- or part part-time directors, partners, staff, special advisers or consultants retained by the consultancy
Subsidiary companies
X
Drag here
  • These companies are entitled to the same benefits as other PRCA members, they must abide by the PRCA Professional Charter and Codes of Conduct and their fee income must be included in the fee income field above.
Associated companies
X
Drag here
  • These companies are not included in your membership and as such do not benefit from PRCA member benefits. These companies are not covered by the PRCA professional charter.
Current clients
X
Drag here

The clients listed in this section are those which retain a consultancy on a continuing basis to deal with their public relations either in a specialised area or as a whole. One asterisk (*) against a client's name indicates that the consultancy has been retained by that client for three years; two asterisks (**) indicate that it has been retained for at least five years. Clients served on an ad-hoc basis are listed separately.

Adhoc clients
X
Drag here

Clients for whom you have undertaken work in the last twelve months on a project rather than a retained basis

Conflict of interest clients
X
Drag here

NB This will not appear as a separate list in the yearbook.