The reputation of the industry

London, 22 June 2009 - A survey of the PRCA PR Leaders' Panel has once again identified a sharp decline in the public trust of communications professionals. The number of respondents believing public perception of MPs, CEOs, tabloid journalists and public relations professionals had worsened over the last ten years, had further increased since a similar survey was conducted by the PRCA in March 2008. 

The recent MP expenses scandal and anger at the corporate bonus culture has meant MPs and CEOs reputations have been particularly badly hit with 100% and 82% of respondents saying the perception had deteriorated leading to a significant decline in public trust. Jane Howard, chairman of Mandate, commented that “Establishments, whether they be political, business or academic, are much less trusted and respected now.”

In print media, magazine journalists were found to have retained the highest level of trust, ahead of broadsheet and tabloid journalists with 71% of participants believing the level of public trust has remained ‘the same'.

The panel agreed there had been an improved level of trust in peer recommendations (64%) and user generated content such as blogs (82%). Organisations recognise this shift in customer behaviour. A separate survey conducted by the PRCA that found 80% of MD's value digital and social media PR as very important or important in their needs over the coming year. Louise Stewart-Muir, of Say Communications said, “There's been a general increase in the public's scepticism regarding all traditional institutions. Almost by default people are more willing to trust or at least listen to the opinions of others as received via blogs, online user reviews, message boards etc.”

Francis Ingham, director general at the PRCA said, “The way individuals consume information is changing rapidly. Organisations not only need to be flexible in the way they reach their audiences, but also need to ensure their behaviour is aligned with the values of their stakeholders. Trust is hard earned but fast eroded.”

 - ENDS -

About the PRCA PR Leaders' Panel

The PRCA PR Leaders' Panel is made up of managing directors of members of the PRCA (Public Relations Consultants Association), the UK trade association that represents the PR industry in the UK.

Questions

1. How has public trust in MPs changed over the last ten years?

   Worse - 100%

2. How has public trust in CEOs changed over the last ten years?

   Improved - 3%

   Same - 15%

   Worse - 82%

3. How has public trust in PROs changed over the last ten years?

   Improved - 15%

   Same - 35%

   Worse - 50%

4. How has public trust in broadsheets changed over the last ten years?

   Improved - 15%

   Same - 53%

   Worse - 32%

5. How has public trust in tabloids changed over the last ten years?

  Same - 41%

  Worse - 59% 

6. How has public trust in magazines changed over the last ten years?

   Improved - 9%

   Same - 71%

   Worse - 20%

7. How has public trust in television changed over the last ten years?

   Improved - 12%

   Same - 29%

   Worse - 59%

8. How has public trust in peer recommendations changed over the last ten years?

   Improved - 64%

   Same - 21%

   Worse 15%

9. How has public trust in blogs and user generated content changed over the last ten years?

    Improved - 82%

    Same - 18%

Comments (0)
Think before you print! Save energy and paper! Do you really need to print this page?
Fee Income
X
Drag here
  • This field should only be completed by the individual with responsibility for your company's PRCA membership.
  • NB - Once you check the box to the left of this field and click update this figure is fixed for the entire year.
  • Fee income is defined as fees or income arising from time spent on carrying out public relations consultancy work plus any mark up and any handling charges or profits made on disbursement or expenses.
  • This figure
    1. will be used to calculate your membership subscription fee for 2009
    2. will be published on the PRCA website and in the yearbook.
  • This figure must include the fees from any subsidiary companies but not associated companies (see below).
  • If you are bound by Sarbanes-Oxley please select that accordingly, we will contact you individually about your fee income.
Holders of public office
X
Drag here
  • Please list any employees who hold any public office including members of House of Parliament, members of local authorities or of any statutory organisations or bodies who are full- or part part-time directors, partners, staff, special advisers or consultants retained by the consultancy
Subsidiary companies
X
Drag here
  • These companies are entitled to the same benefits as other PRCA members, they must abide by the PRCA Professional Charter and Codes of Conduct and their fee income must be included in the fee income field above.
Associated companies
X
Drag here
  • These companies are not included in your membership and as such do not benefit from PRCA member benefits. These companies are not covered by the PRCA professional charter.
Current clients
X
Drag here

The clients listed in this section are those which retain a consultancy on a continuing basis to deal with their public relations either in a specialised area or as a whole. One asterisk (*) against a client's name indicates that the consultancy has been retained by that client for three years; two asterisks (**) indicate that it has been retained for at least five years. Clients served on an ad-hoc basis are listed separately.

Adhoc clients
X
Drag here

Clients for whom you have undertaken work in the last twelve months on a project rather than a retained basis

Conflict of interest clients
X
Drag here

NB This will not appear as a separate list in the yearbook.