Lobbyist registers: a perspective from Down Under

This is a blogpost by Jayne Dullard, CEO of Hotwire CPR, Australia, reproduced with her kind permission. The Hotwire blog can be found here

 

As the CEO of Hotwire’s CPR business in Australia, I thought it would be useful to share a perspective on what we have learnt from the implementation of lobbyist registers in Australia.

The Bell Pottinger story has prompted further calls for regulation of the government relations industry in the UK that will no doubt resonate with voters and particularly with journalists. But do the available tools work?

Lobbyist registers are the obvious salve: free, publicly accessible websites on which agencies, their staff and all their clients are required to be listed by law. They have proliferated in Australia over the last four years, typically in the wake of political crises involving ex-ministers who have moved directly from government into consulting. In this heavily regulated market, we now have registers applying to the Federal Government and to each of the six State governments.

In our experience, the registers have not affected client demand or, looking more broadly, the way the sector operates. They have certainly not reduced the number of lobbyists, which have proliferated. And they fail to capture lobbying work done by the big accountancy firms and other professional services which are not covered by the legislation (or, come to think of it, by journalistic inquiry).

Some Australian State governments have introduced, supplementary to a register, laws that require political staffers to publish details and minutes of scheduled lobbyist meetings online or which prohibit MPs or political staff from lobbying former colleagues within 12 months of leaving government. Those initiatives make it harder to liaise with government via formal channels, which is precisely where you will not find a lobbyist.

But despite the weakness of the model, lobbyist registers are a good thing. More scrutiny and more accountability cannot be bad. And a cleaner, prouder government relations industry would be a good thing too because, believe it or not, we actually do good work: helping healthcare not-for-profits to access funding; helping poorly resourced communities to force governments to deliver infrastructure and services; protecting important industries and institutions from competitors who do not play by the old, trusted rules.

Before we get too carried away by the allure of regulation, however, it is worth noting that none of the ‘revelations’ of the Bureau of Investigative Journalism sting would be captured, revealed or prevented by a lobbyist register or similar policy initiative.

That was just a bunch of guys in suits talking up nothing much in order to make a sale. And that happens, everywhere, every day.

Comments (0)
Think before you print! Save energy and paper! Do you really need to print this page?
Fee Income
X
Drag here
  • This field should only be completed by the individual with responsibility for your company's PRCA membership.
  • NB - Once you check the box to the left of this field and click update this figure is fixed for the entire year.
  • Fee income is defined as fees or income arising from time spent on carrying out public relations consultancy work plus any mark up and any handling charges or profits made on disbursement or expenses.
  • This figure
    1. will be used to calculate your membership subscription fee for 2009
    2. will be published on the PRCA website and in the yearbook.
  • This figure must include the fees from any subsidiary companies but not associated companies (see below).
  • If you are bound by Sarbanes-Oxley please select that accordingly, we will contact you individually about your fee income.
Holders of public office
X
Drag here
  • Please list any employees who hold any public office including members of House of Parliament, members of local authorities or of any statutory organisations or bodies who are full- or part part-time directors, partners, staff, special advisers or consultants retained by the consultancy
Subsidiary companies
X
Drag here
  • These companies are entitled to the same benefits as other PRCA members, they must abide by the PRCA Professional Charter and Codes of Conduct and their fee income must be included in the fee income field above.
Associated companies
X
Drag here
  • These companies are not included in your membership and as such do not benefit from PRCA member benefits. These companies are not covered by the PRCA professional charter.
Current clients
X
Drag here

The clients listed in this section are those which retain a consultancy on a continuing basis to deal with their public relations either in a specialised area or as a whole. One asterisk (*) against a client's name indicates that the consultancy has been retained by that client for three years; two asterisks (**) indicate that it has been retained for at least five years. Clients served on an ad-hoc basis are listed separately.

Adhoc clients
X
Drag here

Clients for whom you have undertaken work in the last twelve months on a project rather than a retained basis

Conflict of interest clients
X
Drag here

NB This will not appear as a separate list in the yearbook.